622 under power

Honestly, I don’t know how America ever became great in the first place, having invented the Phillips head screw! The things strip too easily, and even when they’re not stripped, they don’t hold onto your screwdriver and you have to press down to make them work. The reassembly of 622 had to wait until I replaced the screws holding the bottom onto the gearbox with hex-head bolts, and those had to wait until I had a nut driver to install them.

Still, I’m happy to report that the short circuit was solved without too much hackery applied to the frame. It turned out to be an invisible something stuck in the drawbar.

So, here is the video showing the chassis actually running for the first time (or at least within the first fifteen minutes). There is absolutely no weight in this engine – what you see is what there is, and there is still a slight hesitancy, which I’m hoping some fancy back-EMF electronics might smooth out, but which I will resolve otherwise if I have to.

14 thoughts on “622 under power

  1. Congratulations, Rene!
    This is a great milestone to achieve, well done. Hopefully, the trials of the past few months will disappear as 622 continues to emerge from your creativity.

  2. For those complaining about the Phillips fastener, let us not forget the abomination that is the slotted fastener. There are different flavors of Phillips fasteners, and using the right driver with the right fastener is helpful. It’s easy to confuse a Reed and Prince driver with a Phillips, but the sharper flute angle of the R+P won’t hold a Phillips fastener well.

  3. René, don’t rely on back-EMF to smooth things out. Get it running smoothly first.
    Key is to check that all tolerances/clearances are the same: if there is .002” play fore and aft in one horn block, you need to have that much in all of them, and in the coupling rod holes, etc.

Leave a reply to allegheny1600 Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.